Sustainability and resilience used to be separate conversations. Today, Climate‑related risk, energy transition and regulatory pressure are forcing organizations to connect how they operate their buildings and assets with how they report risk and performance to stakeholders.
In Europe, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) dramatically expands the number of companies required to disclose detailed environmental, social and governance information, including greenhouse gas emissions across Scopes 1, 2 and 3. At the same time, asset‑management standards such as ISO 55001 are encouraging organizations to manage assets systematically, with explicit links to risk, cost and performance.
Facilities and asset management teams sit at the intersection of these two agendas. This article explains how CSRD and ISO 55001 are reshaping their role and outlines three bridges between regulation and resilience that FM can lead.
CSRD requires in‑scope companies to report on material sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities, using the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). For climate, this means disclosing gross Scope 1, 2 and relevant Scope 3 emissions, as well as transition plans, risk management processes and performance metrics.
Buildings, facilities and physical assets contribute significantly to these disclosures:
If facilities data are incomplete or unreliable, the organization’s sustainability reporting will be too.
ISO 55001 specifies requirements for a management system for assets, with emphasis on aligning asset decisions with organizational objectives, risk and performance. It calls for:
For facilities, this translates into a more disciplined approach to asset registers, maintenance strategies, condition assessments and performance indicators. It also creates a natural framework for integrating resilience and sustainability considerations into everyday decisions about buildings and equipment.
Both CSRD and ISO 55001 require organizations to think explicitly about risks related to physical assets. For CSRD, that includes climate‑related physical risks (such as flooding, heatwaves, storms) and transition risks (such as tightening energy standards for buildings).
Facilities and asset teams can support these disclosures by:
This information feeds directly into risk narratives in sustainability reports and strengthens the credibility of resilience claims.
As noted, buildings and facilities account for a large share of energy use in Europe. Upgrading and operating them efficiently is essential to achieving EU‑level targets for reduced energy consumption and emissions.
Facilities teams are responsible for much of the data needed for accurate CSRD reporting:
A unified asset and energy management platform allows FM to provide these data in a consistent, auditable format, supporting both financial and sustainability reporting teams.
CSRD does not just ask for numbers; it asks for narratives about how sustainability‑related risks are identified, assessed and managed. Facilities and asset teams can demonstrate their contribution by showing how incident and maintenance data become part of risk management.
Examples include:
When this information is captured systematically, it becomes evidence of a mature risk and resilience culture, not just operational noise.
To make the link between CSRD, ISO 55001 and FM tangible, consider a four‑level maturity model for facilities data:
The trajectory from Level 1 to Level 4 is as much about governance and culture as it is about technology.
Want to connect your facilities data with CSRD and ISO 55001 requirements?
Get in touch with our team to review your current asset and energy data and identify gaps before your next reporting cycle.
Schedule a session – Book here